MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2790165362 · doi:10.1080/20013078.2018.1454776

Improved resolution in extracellular vesicle populations using 405 instead of 488 nm side scatter

2018· article· en· W2790165362 on OpenAlexafffund
Mark J. McVey, Christopher M. Spring, Wolfgang M. Kuebler

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Extracellular Vesicles · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicExtracellular vesicles in disease
Canadian institutionsSickKids FoundationUniversity of TorontoSt. Michael's Hospital
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchCanada Foundation for InnovationCanadian Blood Services
KeywordsResolution (logic)Extracellular vesiclesWavelengthMaterials scienceOpticsPhysicsBiologyComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ABSTRACT Improvements in identification and assessment of extracellular vesicles (EVs) have fuelled a recent surge in EV publications investigating their roles as biomarkers and mediators of disease. Meaningful scientific comparisons are, however, hampered by difficulties in accurate, reproducible enumeration and characterization of EVs in biological fluids. High‐sensitivity flow cytometry (FCM) is presently the most commonly applied strategy to assess EVs, yet its utility is limited by variant ability to resolve smaller EVs. Here, we propose the use of 405 nm (violet) wavelength lasers in place of 488 nm (blue) for side scatter (SSC) detection to obtain greater resolution of EVs using high‐sensitivity FCM. To test this hypothesis, we modelled EV resolution by violet versus blue SSC in silico and compared resolution of reference beads and biological EVs from plasma and bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) fluid using either violet or blue wavelength SSC EV detection. Mie scatter modelling predicted that violet as compared to blue SSC increases resolution of small (100–500 nm) spherical particles with refractive indices (1.34–1.46) similar to EVs by approximately twofold in terms of light intensity and by nearly 20% in SSC signal quantum efficiency. Resolution of reference beads was improved by violet instead of blue SSC with two‐ and fivefold decreases in coefficients of variation for particles of 300–500 nm and 180–240 nm size, respectively. Resolution was similarly improved for detection of EVs from plasma or BAL fluid. Violet SSC detection for high‐sensitivity FCM allows for significantly greater resolution of EVs in plasma and BAL compared to conventional blue SSC and particularly improves resolution of smaller EVs. Notably, the proposed strategy is readily implementable and inexpensive for machines already equipped with 405 nm SSC or the ability to accommodate 405/10 nm bandpass filters in their violet detector arrays.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.293
Teacher spread0.262 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations86
Published2018
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Extracellular VesiclesSame topicExtracellular vesicles in diseaseFrench-language works237,207