MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2790183474 · doi:10.1038/s42004-017-0007-6

Accumulation of persistent tungsten in bone as in situ generated polytungstate

2018· article· en· W2790183474 on OpenAlexafffund
Cassidy R. VanderSchee, David Kuter, Alicia M. Bolt, Feng‐Chun Lo, Renfei Feng, Juergen Thieme, Yu‐chen Karen Chen‐Wiegart, Garth J. Williams, Koren K. Mann, D. Scott Bohle

Bibliographic record

VenueCommunications Chemistry · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicOccupational exposure and asthma
Canadian institutionsCanadian Light Source (Canada)McGill University
FundersNational Research FoundationNational Research Council CanadaWestern Economic Diversification CanadaBasic Energy SciencesCanadian Light SourceNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchNational Synchrotron Radiation Research CenterOffice of ScienceCanada Research ChairsUniversity of SaskatchewanBrookhaven National LaboratoryU.S. Department of Energy
KeywordsTungstenCancellous boneCortical boneChemistryIn situBone matrixBiophysicsBone marrowInternal medicineRadiochemistryEndocrinologyBiologyAnatomyMedicineOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Tungsten accumulates in bone but is neither labile nor inert once absorbed. Tungsten’s relatively high cytosolic solubility and availability are problematic given its association with childhood lymphocytic leukemia. In light of tungsten’s technological prevalence, and the increased concern of regulatory agencies, here we characterize the chemical form and localization in mice exposed to tungsten through drinking water. Using X-ray fluorescence spectroscopy, we report accumulation of tungsten in bone tissue with some sites having ~10-fold greater intensities than background levels. The long bone tissue studied includes cortical, cancellous and bone marrow. Persistence of tungsten in cortical bone tissue following removal of the source indicates that it is retained in an insoluble form. The X-ray absorption near-edge structure spectra for tungsten in these tissues indicate that it is no longer in the originally administered form, orthotungstate, but rather resembles the heteropolytungsate species, phosphotungstate.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.073
GPT teacher head0.367
Teacher spread0.294 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations25
Published2018
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCommunications ChemistrySame topicOccupational exposure and asthmaFrench-language works237,207