MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2790303732 · doi:10.3356/jrr-17-41.1

Highest Elevational Records for Northern Saw-whet Owls (<i>Aegolius acadicus</i>)

2018· article· en· W2790303732 on OpenAlexaff
Juan Pablo Medina, Jessica Mariana Sánchez-Jasso, Spencer G. Sealy, Celene Salgado-Miranda, Edgardo Soriano‐Vargas

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Raptor Research · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicAvian ecology and behavior
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeographyHumanitiesPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Resumen Se reportan los records de maxima altitud para una poblacion de Aegolius acadicus a partir de conteos puntuales (2010, 2014 y 2015) y estaciones de anillamiento (2016 y 2017) en el Area Natural Protegida Nevado de Toluca (ANPNT), Estado de Mexico, Mexico, en un gradiente altitudinal de 3700 a 4150 m snm. En noviembre de 2016, una hembra fue capturada y anillada a 4074 m snm, siendo el registro a mayor altitud para A. acadicus. Los datos obtenidos sugieren que esta poblacion puede ser residente del ANPNT y contribuyen al conocimiento de la historia natural de A. acadicus en la porcion sur de su distribucion. Recomendamos continuar los estudios de esta especie en Mexico. [Traduccion de los autores editada]

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.179
Threshold uncertainty score0.996

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.072
GPT teacher head0.384
Teacher spread0.313 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Raptor ResearchSame topicAvian ecology and behaviorFrench-language works237,207