MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2790307162 · doi:10.1109/taes.2018.2805228

Robust Clutter Rejection in Passive Radar via Generalized Subband Cancellation

2018· article· en· W2790307162 on OpenAlexaff
Jianxin Yi, Xianrong Wan, Deshi Li, Henry Leung

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicRadar Systems and Signal Processing
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
FundersNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsClutterComputer scienceRadarOffset (computer science)Constant false alarm rateSubspace topologyPassive radarAlgorithmCarrier frequency offsetFrequency offsetElectronic engineeringContinuous-wave radarEngineeringArtificial intelligenceRadar imagingTelecommunicationsOrthogonal frequency-division multiplexing

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Passive radar is known to suffer from high clutter. In this paper, a generalized subband cancellation (GSC) algorithm is proposed to achieve robust clutter rejection. Four major factors are taken into account, namely carrier frequency offset, sampling frequency offset, fractional delay, and hardware frequency response. The GSC algorithm utilizes subband signal processing and tailored clutter subspace construction to solve the problems caused by these factors. Quantitative evaluations demonstrate that the GSC algorithm approaches the optimal clutter cancellation performance. Its effectiveness is also validated using field experimental data.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.002

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.199
Teacher spread0.189 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations55
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic SystemsSame topicRadar Systems and Signal ProcessingFrench-language works237,207