MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2790326412 · doi:10.1353/pgn.2017.0082

Isabella d'Este: Selected Letters transed. by Deanna Shemek

2017· article· en· W2790326412 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueParergon · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicRenaissance and Early Modern Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsExtant taxonEliteAgency (philosophy)PoliticsCONTESTPolitical scienceHistoryHumanitiesLawArtSociologySocial science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Reviewed by: Isabella d'Este: Selected Letters transed. by Deanna Shemek Zita Eva Rohr Shemek, Deanna, ed. and trans., Isabella d'Este: Selected Letters (The Other Voice in Early Modern Europe: The Toronto Series, 54; Medieval and Renaissance Texts and Studies, 516), Tempe, ACMRS, Toronto, Iter Press, 2017; paperback; pp. xv, 691; 5 genealogical charts; R.R.P. US $64.95; ISBN 9780866985727. This collection speaks not only to the career and agency of Isabella d'Este, marchesa di Mantova, but also provides evidence of the activities and influence of other powerful and influential women who formed part of her extensive networks of news-gathering and correspondence. Elite and royal women such as Isabella d'Este might not have led armies in person, but they certainly had a considerable role to play in the organization and provisioning of military campaigns. Such women were not cloistered away from the main game of both secular and ecclesiastical politics and diplomacy — we fall into error if we assume that the public and the private in all of this existed as discrete spheres of influence and agency, with the domestic or private sphere held to be somehow less important. With this selection of 830 letters from some 16,000 extant letters preserved in the Archivio di Stato di Mantova, Shemek contributes to the accumulating body of evidence of the sans frontières un-exceptionality of elite and royal female agency, authority and influence during the pre-modern and early modern periods. Shemek has arranged her almost 700-page volume coherently with a view to ease of access. She commences proceedings with a targeted Introduction, 'Isabella d'Este: Princess, Collector, Correspondent', which gives the reader ample background information regarding her protagonist as well as laying out her aims in selecting the letters she has included from the some 16,000 available to her. Shemek offers us a broad selection of Isabella's correspondence, the first of its kind and 'the most voluminous documentary record of her "voice" in many spheres' (pp. 2–3) and the first such selection to be translated into English. In offering up such a catholic selection, Shemek seeks both to 'entice new readers to explore the rich landscape of early modern Europe and bring new material to bear on discussions of the period among [End Page 252] experts in the field' (p. 3). In this she succeeds to an admirable extent, and I am convinced that she will likewise manage to unsettle 'comfortable notions of Isabella's character that derive from partial or prejudicial views' (p. 3). The letters are organized chronologically across five decades of Isabella's highly productive and influential life. Section 1, Letters 1–200, covers the period 1479–99, taking in the first decade of her reign as marchesa of Mantua. It opens with a charming letter addressed to her father (23) recording the injustice she felt upon being held by her mother's lady-in-waiting Sirvia while being spanked by Madama, her mother Eleonora d'Este, having been first scolded by her governess Colonna. Shemek emphasizes that such letters give a rare glimpse of a princess in formation (21). Isabella's correspondence here testifies to her work on many fronts as a governing consort, and sheds light upon the urgency for the production of a male heir. Section 2, 1500–1509, Letters 201–420, provides us with a rich tapestry of Isabella's second decade as marchesa. Moments of domestic intimacy share the pages with politics, luxury consumption, and the tricky business of court management. They show her hard at work on behalf of her subjects, and emphasize the importance of having trusted networks. With the capture of Francesco Gonzaga by Venetian forces, 1510 would prove to be Isabella's personal annus horribilis. Section 3, 1510–1519, Letters 421–608, opens with Francesco's capture, then release, and closes with his death in 1519. Isabella strove mightily to keep their state solvent during Francesco's captivity: there was famine to complicate matters, and a schism developed between the couple as Francesco sought his freedom by suggesting that he exchange their young son and heir Federico as a hostage to obtain it. The couple emerged from...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.077
Threshold uncertainty score0.993

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.236
Teacher spread0.204 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it