The Russian arms sales to Iran and their (in)consequences on Russia-Israel military-industrial relations
Bibliographic record
Abstract
En dépit d’un développement fructueux ces deux dernières décennies, la coopération militaro-technologique entre la Russie et Israël demeure un sujet récurrent de débat pour la stratégie de sécurité de cette dernière, notamment en raison de l’assiduité des ventes d’armements russes à l’Iran. Cet article vise à démontrer que la logique de pérennisation commerciale joue un rôle fondamental dans la légitimation de l’architecture coopérative mise en place par les industriels russes et israéliens de la défense. Après avoir passé en revue l’historique et les fondements de ce rapprochement sectoriel, l’article aborde les paradoxes liés aux liens entretenus par la Russie avec deux États ennemis. Aucune conséquence majeure n’est attendue de cette double évolution.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.008 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".