Versatility of the Medial Femoral Condyle Flap for Extremity Reconstruction and Identification of Risk Factors for Nonunion, Delayed Time to Union, and Complications
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The medial femoral condyle (MFC) flap has become a popular choice for treatment of small bony defects. We aim to describe outcomes after MFC flap treatment of upper and lower extremity osseous defects and test the null hypothesis that no factors influence risks for nonunion, increased time to union, and complications. METHODS: A retrospective chart review was performed on all patients undergoing MFC free vascularized bone flaps by the senior author between May 2010 and March 2016. Preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative data were collected. RESULTS: We identified 29 patients for inclusion (22 upper and 7 lower extremity reconstructions) treated with the MFC flap for diagnoses including long bone nonunion, avascular necrosis (AVN), or AVN with nonunion. Mean postoperative follow-up was 56 weeks. The average patient was 38 years old (range = 17-61 years) and had undergone 1.5 previous failed surgeries. Union was achieved in 86% of patients at a mean of 15.8 weeks (83% at 17.9 weeks for the scaphoid). No patient with lunate AVN progressed. There were no intraoperative flap complications or bone flap loss, but 28% underwent additional unplanned surgical procedures. We identified previous surgery as a risk factor for delayed union but did not observe significant risk factors predictive of nonunion or complications requiring unplanned reoperation. CONCLUSIONS: Extremity reconstruction using the MFC corticocancellous flap results in a high rate of union yet minimal donor morbidity for a challenging patient cohort. Previous surgery was a risk factor for increased time to union.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".