Molecular Epidemiology of Acute Infectious Diarrhoea in Paediatric Cases at the Winnipeg Children’s Hospital Emergency Room
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Acute infectious diarrhea (AcID) causes a significant health burden on the population of developed countries, and even a higher burden in the developing world. The only investigation into the causes of AcID in Winnipeg was conducted in the late 1970s. That study determined that 3%-5% of Children’s Hospital Emergency Room (CHER) visits were due to AcID, and about 50% of those were due to rotavirus infections. We conducted a prospective case-control study to reveal the current spectrum of viral pathogens associated with AcID and the distribution and frequency of their occurrence among the pediatric population of Winnipeg. In this study, nucleic acid detection (NAD) and genome sequence information confirmed the presence and identity of each pathogen, and established whether an etiological shift in the distribution of pathogens, both between families and strains of specific pathogens, occurred. Stool samples were collected from pediatric cases with AcID at the ER along with asymptomatic cases for control. A panel of viral nucleic acid detection (NAD) assays was established by the Viral Gastroenteritis Study Group for human astro, calici (Noro and Sapo), entro, polio, hepA, rota and reo viruses according to the published procedures. A new assay for Aichivirus was developed, and the VGSG has established a novel rotavirus assay which is capable of detecting rotavirus from at least 4 different host species (Human, bovine, porcine and simian). Amplified viral targets were sequenced and the information submitted to GeneBank to confirm the strain of each isolate. A total of 1128 patients visited WCHER and WC during the study period and among them 242 patients were enrolled. In 104 cases viruses were identified. A total number of 114 viruses were identified either by NAD or EM assay. Out of 114 viruses, prevalence of HAdV, NoV GI/II and HRV were 44%, 23% and 23% respectively. Mixed infections were found in 4% of cases.This knowledge of pathogen distribution will facilitate design of effective methods for prevention, treatment and intervention in the spread of AcID pathogens.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".