MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2790374702 · doi:10.1177/0361198118797484

The Effect of Bottom Ash on Soil Suction and Resilient Modulus of Medium-Plasticity Clay

2018· article· en· W2790374702 on OpenAlexaff
Arian Asefzadeh, Leila Hashemian, Alireza Bayat

Bibliographic record

VenueTransportation Research Record Journal of the Transportation Research Board · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicSoil and Unsaturated Flow
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeotechnical engineeringSuctionBottom ashModulusWater contentMaterials scienceAggregate (composite)PlasticityEnvironmental scienceGeologyComposite materialFly ashEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The effect of adding bottom ash to medium-plasticity clay as a soil stabilizer was evaluated in this study by performing triaxial resilient modulus tests. Two log–log resilient modulus prediction equations found in the literature (MEPDG and NCHRP 1-28) were selected and calibrated for mixtures of bottom ash and clay at different moisture contents. It was found that, with 25% bottom ash in the mixture, the resilient modulus increased between 5% and 23% under different stress states. The soil total and matric suctions of the mixtures were indirectly measured using the filter paper method, and the total suction parameter was incorporated in the two log–log prediction models. The nonlinear regression analysis revealed that the average goodness-of-fit statistics for one of the modified models showed highly satisfactory performance in predicting the resilient modulus values.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.315
Teacher spread0.289 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTransportation Research Record Journal of the Transportation Research BoardSame topicSoil and Unsaturated FlowFrench-language works237,207