MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2790406242

New possibilities in new recipes: the design of a food-based acculturative facility for new immigrant women

2013· article· en· W2790406242 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Monika Hamblin

Bibliographic record

VenueMspace (University of Manitoba) · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicMigration, Ethnicity, and Economy
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsImmigrationAcculturationSociologyComputer sciencePolitical science
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Most new immigrants to Canada bring with them an identity rooted in the culture in which they grew up. This identity will go through a shift in its adjustment to life in Canada. A number of factors have been identified that can contribute to increased stress during the acculturative process, and these are explored, specifically as they relate to women immigrants. With an understanding of the potential psychological experience involved in acculturative identity shift, this practicum projects proposes a response through the use of food and its preparation. Sources regarding food and culture were examined to provide supporting evidence to this strategy, as well as additional precedent examples. The programme of a culinary based school aims to provide new immigrant women with improved English language usage, work-applicable skills, a support system, and confidence, in order to help them find meaningful long term employment, in a way that addresses their specific challenges. The final design includes educational, lounge and personal spaces, a specially designed commercial kitchen, public dining areas, as well as other considerations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.014
Threshold uncertainty score0.028

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0040.002
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0020.003
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.045
GPT teacher head0.237
Teacher spread0.192 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMspace (University of Manitoba)→Same topicMigration, Ethnicity, and Economy→French-language works237,207→