Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The narrative dealing with the official founding of Ava as recorded by both the Old Burmese inscriptions and later Burmese chronicles is the subject of this chapter. Practical, strategic, and military concerns, especially the impact of the Syam (Shan) raids, were paramount in choosing the site on which Ava stood. Thadominbya and Minkyiswa Sawkai were the two kings responsible for the founding and establishment of the new dynasty and kingdom. Without them, and ministers such as Minyaza, the period of <italic>dis</italic>-integration that followed Pagan’s decline would surely have not abated, but perhaps continued well into the third quarter of the fourteenth century, making <italic>re</italic>-integration that much more difficult. Original and contemporary epigraphic evidence is used to supplement the chronicle narrative in this reconstruction of Ava’s founding, not only providing viability to the account, but also allowing the reader to gain some insight into the nature of the indigenous chronicles and their perspective on the factors responsible for the establishment of Ava.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it