A178 RARE BENIGN LYMPHOID COLONIC POLYP
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Benign Lymphoid polyps are uncommon lesions that were mostly described in the small bowel and in children. Those lesions were occasionally found in the colon. There are only few reported cases in adults in which the lesions were mostly polypoid and described as lymphonodular hyperplasia. We are presenting a case of a large benign lymphoid polyp in the transverse colon of a 64 year-old lady referred to our care for alteration in bowel habit and anemia. Colonoscopy showed a 3 cm (Paris 1p) friable Polyp which was excised in its entity. Histopathology examination revealed prominent lymphoid follicle formation with prominent germinal centers and no signs of malignancy. Benign lymphoid polyp is a rare condition posing a diagnostic challenge as it can be misinterpreted for a malignant lesion. The aim is to highlight Benign lymphoid polyp as a rare condition posing a diagnostic challenge as it can be misinterpreted for a malignant lesion. Previous case reports for this uncommon condition were reviewed. Intestinal lymphoid hyperplasia is a localised or widespread benign proliferation of lymphoid tissue within the intestinal wall, producing single or multiple lesions. Histopathological examination is required to role out malignancy. we are describing a Large benign lymphoid polyp in the transverse colon of a 64 year-old lady referred to our care for alteration in bowel habit and anemia. Colonoscopy showed a 3 cm (Paris 1p) friable Polyp which was excised in its entity. Histopathology examination revealed prominent lymphoid follicle formation with prominent germinal centers and no signs of malignancy. Benign lymphoid polyp is a rare condition posing a diagnostic challenge as it can be misinterpreted for a malignant lesion. CCC, None
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".