MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Gestalt with Groups: A Cross-Cultural Perspective

2006· article· en· W2790518215 on OpenAlexaff
Gaffney Seán

Bibliographic record

VenueGestalt Review · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicChild Therapy and Development
Canadian institutionsContinental (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGestalt psychologyMulticulturalismPerspective (graphical)Context (archaeology)Raising (metalworking)Diversity (politics)Cultural diversitySociologyPsychologyEpistemologySocial psychologyAnthropologyPedagogyEngineeringGeographyPerceptionComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract An increasing awareness of cultural differences (rather than the more politically correct “diversity,” which is more related to multicultural societies) is raising issues in many fields concerning the inappropriateness of applying concepts undiluted from one culture to another. Post-colonial sensitivities are part of this dynamic. This article explores some cultural concepts in the context of groups and group work, links this to a Gestalt perspective, and raises issues potentially important to Gestalt therapists, trainers, and OSD consultants working internationally.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.008
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.041

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0080.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0030.002
Science and technology studies0.0040.021
Scholarly communication0.0090.006
Open science0.0010.005
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.355
Teacher spread0.338 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGestalt ReviewSame topicChild Therapy and DevelopmentFrench-language works237,207