MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2790520484 · doi:10.1093/jcag/gwy008.076

A75 TARGETING THE WARBURG EFFECT IN HEPATOCELLULAR CARCINOMA CELLS

2018· article· en· W2790520484 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Shamir Cassim, Valérie‐Ann Raymond, Marc Bilodeau

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicCancer, Hypoxia, and Metabolism
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLactate dehydrogenase AWarburg effectLactate dehydrogenaseGlycolysisIn vivoCell cultureHepatocellular carcinomaCancer cellAnaerobic glycolysisMetaboliteViability assayCellCancer researchBiologyChemistryMolecular biologyCancerBiochemistryEnzyme

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The avid consumption of glucose (Glu) with concomitant lactate production by malignant cells is called the Warburg effect (WE). As most invasive tumours harbour this feature, this has proven of great clinical importance in detecting malignancies with PET scans. Unfortunately, in the liver, the detection of tumors is often compromised by the strong intrinsic Glu metabolic activity. Understanding the manner by which hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) cells use Glu to proliferate is essential if we want to bypass the aforementionned difficulty. Recently, targeting molecular mechanisms involved in the WE such as lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) has been advocated as a very promising anti-cancer target. We hypothesized that the modulation of LDH which catalyzes the conversion of pyruvate to lactate might have an impact on HCC cell tumorigenicity, since the production of lactate has been shown to increase tumor invasion. We generated a mouse hepatoma cell line Dt81Hepa1-6 (Dt) derived from Hepa1-6 (H1-6) cells that displays greater tumorigenicity in vivo. We hypothesized that this increased tumorigenicity involved the WE. Cells were cultured in 25mM Glu over a period of 24-48h. Glu uptake was assessed using a fluorescent Glu analog, 2-NBDG. mRNA and metabolite quantification were respectively measured by qPCR and HPLC. Aerobic glycolysis was inhibited using increasing doses of sodium oxamate (SODOX), a classic inhibitor of LDH, to reduce lactate production. LDH activity was measured by the Biochemical core facility of CRCHUM. MTT assay was used to test the dose-response effects of SODOX on cell viability. Cell Doubling Time (CDT) was evaluated every 24h for 72h with SODOX (100 mM). Dt showed an increased ability to uptake Glu in low extracellular Glu in comparison with H1-6 (3 ± 0.3 vs 1.4 ± 0.1DO/μg prot, P<0.01). Increasing the extracellular Glu concentration led to an increase in Glu uptake only in Dt cells (P<0.001). qPCR and metabolite analysis showed that Dt displayed a higher glycolytic rate than H1-6, with greater ATP production (P<0.001). We then investigated the effect of SODOX on these cells. First, LDH acticvity was reduced in a dose-response manner after 24h with SODOX (100mM, P<0.01). MTT revealed that SODOX dose-dependently decreased cell viability of both H1-6 and Dt cells but that Dt were significantly more resistant at 100mM SODOX (43 ± 1.5 vs 55 ± 2.6, P<0.01). Finally, CDT revealed that SODOX significantly slowed Dt proliferation; this effect was even more pronounced on H1-6 (P<0.001). These results suggest that the WE is effective in HCC cells and that increased tumorigenesis is associated with metabolic changes in glucose metabolism that favor ATP production. The WE represents a potentially remarkable new target to treat HCC. Our preliminary results suggest that decreasing LDH activity is one of the ways to achieve this goal. CHAIRE NOVARTIS DE LA FONDATION CANADIENNE DU FOIE DE L’UNIVERSITE DE MONTREAL

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.200
Teacher spread0.196 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology→Same topicCancer, Hypoxia, and Metabolism→French-language works237,207→