MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2790531973 · doi:10.4095/285368

GIS-enabled geology maps of the McConnell Range and environs, Northwest Territories

2010· report· en· W2790531973 on OpenAlexaffabout
D G Cook, B C MacLean, David Morrow

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typereport
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeological Studies and Exploration
Canadian institutionsNatural Resources Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRange (aeronautics)GeologyGeographyCartographyPhysical geographyArchaeologyEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Nine previously published 1:50,000 scale Geological Survey of Canada Open File maps are reproduced here in a GIS-enabled format. The distribution of Cretaceous strata has been upgraded by the subdivision of previously undivided Cretaceous units. The nine earlier NTS map products were: 96B/3, Blackwater Lake North (Open File 5334); 96B/4, Twin Peaks (OF5335); 96B/5, Twin Fish Lake (OF5336); 96C/1, Birch Island (OF 5470); 96C/7, Burnt Point (OF 5469); 96C/8, Saline River (OF5468); 96C/9, unnamed (OF5467); 96C/10, Old Fort Point (OF5472); 96C/15, St Charles Creek (OF5466). The McConnell Range north of 64o North latitude is divided along the Saline River valley into morphologically different northern and southern parts. A broad upland south of Saline River is replaced to the north by a number of individual hills or mountains. Mount Clark, the most prominent landmark in the region is 4798 ft. (1454 m) high, and towers above other mountains, which more typically are 2500- ft. (760- m) high. The south-to-north topographic change corresponds to an abrupt change in structural style. The southern part is a broad asymmetric anticlinal uplift bounded on the east by a steeply dipping thrust fault with subsidiary splays and an overturned footwall panel. The steeply dipping thrust is rooted in Proterozoic strata. The gently dipping west limb of the anticlinal uplift is separated from the plain of Mackenzie valley by Birch Island Anticline, a northwest trending narrow short wavelength fold, which appears to be detached on the Saline River Formation and having no obvious direct linkage to the main, deeply-rooted fault, underlying the McConnell Range. The isolated hills and mountains north of Saline River are characterized by smaller, doubly plunging anticlinal culminations cored by resistant sandstone of the Lower Cambrian Mount Clark Formation and mantled by recessive shale, siltstone, and sandstone of the Mount Cap Formation. The largest of these anticlines is Mount Clark, a complex dome, bounded to the east by a steeply dipping reverse fault, essentially the same fault that bounds the southern broad anticline. A component of right-lateral strike-slip apparently accompanied the northeast-southwest shortening. Mount Clark dome can be reasonably inferred to be cored by Proterozoic strata. Northwest of Mount Clark Paleozoic carbonates (Franklin Mountain Formation to Hume Formation) lie in a broad upland dissected by normal faults and related grabens. The normal faults may be a local collapse phenomenon related to dissolution of Saline River Formation salt. The normal faults are of uncertain age other than post-Middle Devonian (post-Hume Formation). Cretaceous strata are poorly exposed and their relationship to the extensional phase is unknown. McConnell Range plunges northward and essentially has no expression north of Big Smith Creek. Correspondingly, stratigraphic offset on the frontal fault decreases northward such that Paleozoic carbonates are faulted against carbonates of similar age. Forty-five km north of Big Smith Creek, a narrow range informally known as the St Charles range occurs essentially on trend with the McConnell Range frontal thrust. It appears to be detached on the Saline River Formation and cored by a pillow of Saline River Formation salt. It may be localized along an ancestral Cambrian normal fault. The interpretation of a salt-cored anticline, based on equivocal seismic data, is supported by the presence of a salt-cored anticline documented on seismic records from the subsurface to the west of the 'range'. Proterozoic strata outcrop at the mountain front in the southernmost part of the report area. They probably pertain to a 'Sequence B' equivalent to the Mackenzie Mountains Supergroup; although a single detrital zircon implies that these strata belong in 'Sequence C', equivalent to the Windermere Supergroup. Lower, Middle, and Upper Cambrian clastics and evaporites are thin (0-140 m) in the subsurface within the study area to the east but thicken to greater than 1000m in Mackenzie valley to the west. They appear to thicken abruptly across a hinge line coinciding with the McConnell range frontal thrust. Apparently a normal fault or fault zone bounding Mackenzie Trough was inverted during Laramide compression to form McConnell Range. The Paleozoic carbonate succession (Upper Cambrian Franklin Mountain Formation to Middle Devonian Hume Formation) is punctuated by unconformities at the base of the Upper Ordovician - Silurian Mount Kindle Formation, and at the base of the Silurian - Lower Devonian Tsetso or Bear Rock formations. Cretaceous strata are poorly exposed but were encountered in exploration drill holes. In general Cretaceous strata to the east of McConnell Range are Early Cretaceous in age, whereas to the west in Mackenzie River valley they are Late Cretaceous. An unconformity occurs at each of the Lower and Upper Cretaceous successions. Lower Cretaceous strata were removed from the Mackenzie valley area by pre-Late Cretaceous erosion along Keele Arch.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.053
Threshold uncertainty score0.176

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0050.011
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0530.007

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.198
Teacher spread0.177 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2010
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicGeological Studies and Exploration→French-language works237,207→