Development and initial validation of the verbal and nonverbal sexual communication questionnaire in Canada and Spain
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Verbal and nonverbal sexual communication helps couples develop a mutually satisfying sexual script. This research, composed of two studies, was aimed at developing a scale in English and Spanish that assesses verbal and nonverbal sexual communication. The English and the Spanish versions showed the same factorial structure (Verbal Sexual Communication, Nonverbal Sexual Initiation and Pleasure, and Nonverbal Sexual Refusal). All subscales showed good internal consistency and validity, except for the Nonverbal Sexual Refusal that was, for the most part, not correlated with the other communication scales and was negatively correlated with sexual satisfaction. The implications and applicability of the Verbal and Nonverbal Sexual Communication Questionnaire in clinical and research settings are discussed.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it