Male Depression Subtypes and Suicidality
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Assessment of men's externalizing symptoms has been theorized to assist in the identification of those at risk of suicide. A nationally representative sample of Canadian men (N = 1000; mean, 49.63 years) provided data on internalizing and externalizing symptoms, and history of recent suicide planning and attempt (previous 4 weeks). Latent profile analysis indicted three classification subtypes. Robust effects were observed regarding history of recent suicide planning and attempt. Men with a marked externalizing profile (12.7% of sample), which included substance use, anger, and risk taking, were significantly more likely to have had a recent suicide plan (risk ratio, 14.47; p < 0.001) or to have attempted suicide within the previous 4 weeks (risk ratio, 21.32; p < 0.001) relative to asymptomatic men (67.7% of sample). Because recent suicide attempt was a rare event in the present sample (n = 13), findings need to be replicated in higher-risk populations. Results support primary care screening for both men's internalizing and externalizing depression symptoms.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".