MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2790658928

FLEET : a Framework for evaLuating European options in a parallEl and disTributed environment

2005· article· en· W2790658928 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Amit Chhabra

Bibliographic record

VenueMspace (University of Manitoba) · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicRegional Development and Policy
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsComputer science
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Option pricing is one of the important problem in finance and demands efficient algo- rithms that produce accurate and fast results.This thesis aims to develop FLEETI: A Framework for evaluating European options in a parallEl and disTributed environment on a Network of Computers (NoCs).In this thesis, the NoC is an interconnection of a collection of heterogeneous computers and an eight node shared memory machine.We have implemented a multithreaded pricing algorithm on shared memory architecture us- ing Java OpenMP (JOMP IBWKOOO, EPC]).FLEET uses the Common Object Request Broker Architecture (CORBA [SGR99, Bol02]) as a client-server model where a client requests for the value of an option (with certain characteristics of the option) over the net- work to a server.The server computes the option value using the Black-Scholes [8573] model, a partial differential equation.The server is multithreaded and uses one thread- per-client policy to serve clients over the network.We use the explicit Forward-Time Central-Space (FTCS) finite-difference scheme to solve the Black-Scholes equation on the server side to evaluate the option price.'We implemented a database containing the 'FLEET."f@(processorsinmycase)workingtogetherunderonecommand'

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.011
Threshold uncertainty score0.036

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.002
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.003
Open science0.0030.002
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0110.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.051
GPT teacher head0.285
Teacher spread0.234 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMspace (University of Manitoba)Same topicRegional Development and PolicyFrench-language works237,207