MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2790673981 · doi:10.1093/petrology/egy024

The Stillwater Complex: Integrating Zircon Geochronological and Geochemical Constraints on the Age, Emplacement History and Crystallization of a Large, Open-System Layered Intrusion

2018· article· en· W2790673981 on OpenAlex
Corey J. Wall, James S. Scoates, Dominique Weis, Richard M. Friedman, Marghaleray Amini, William J. Meurer

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Petrology · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeological and Geochemical Analysis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsZirconGeologyGeochemistryIntrusionLayered intrusionPetrology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Neoarchean Stillwater Complex, one of the world’s largest known layered intrusions and host to a rich platinum-group element deposit known as the J-M Reef, represents one of the cornerstones for the study of magmatic processes in the Earth’s crust. A complete framework for crystallization of the Stillwater Complex is presented based on the trace element geochemistry of zircon and comprehensive U–Pb zircon–baddeleyite–titanite–rutile geochronology of 22 samples through the magmatic stratigraphy. Trace element concentrations and ratios in zircon are highly variable and support crystallization of zircon from fractionated interstitial melt at near-solidus temperatures in the ultramafic and mafic cumulates (Ti-in-zircon thermometry=980–720℃). U–Pb geochronological results indicate that the Stillwater Complex crystallized over a ~3 million-year interval from 2712 Ma (Basal series) to 2709 Ma (Banded series); late-stage granophyres and at least one phase of post-emplacement mafic dikes also crystallized at 2709 Ma. The dates reveal that the intrusion was not constructed in a strictly sequential stratigraphic order from the base (oldest) to the top (youngest) such that the cumulate succession in the complex does not follow the stratigraphic law of superposition. Two distinct age groups are recognized in the Ultramafic series. The lowermost Peridotite zone, up to and including the G chromitite, crystallized at 2710 Ma from magmas emplaced below the overlying uppermost Peridotite and Bronzitite zones that crystallized earlier at 2711 Ma. Based on the age and locally discordant nature of the J-M Reef, the base of this sequence likely represents an intrusion-wide magmatic unconformity that formed during the onset of renewed and voluminous magmatism at 2709 Ma. The thick anorthosite units in the Middle Banded series are older (2710 Ma) than the rest of the Banded series, a feature consistent with a flotation cumulate or ‘rockberg’ model. The anorthosites are related to crystallization of mafic and ultramafic rocks now preserved in the Ultramafic series and in the lower part of the Lower Banded series below the J-M Reef. The Stillwater Complex was constructed by repeated injections of magma that crystallized to produce a stack of amalgamated sills, some out-of-sequence, consequently it does not constitute the crystallized products of a progressively filled and cooled magma chamber. This calls into question current concepts regarding the intrusive and crystallization histories of major open-system layered intrusions and challenges us to rethink our understanding of the timescales of magma processes and emplacement in these large and petrologically significant and remarkable complexes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.274
Threshold uncertainty score0.998

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.239
Teacher spread0.209 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it