MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Circulating Tumour DNA for Detecting Minimal Residual Disease in Multiple Myeloma

2018· review· en· W2790687822 on OpenAlexaff
Trevor J. Pugh

Bibliographic record

VenueSeminars in Hematology · 2018
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMultiple Myeloma Research and Treatments
Canadian institutionsUniversity Health NetworkUniversity of TorontoOntario Institute for Cancer ResearchPrincess Margaret Cancer Centre
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMinimal residual diseaseMultiple myelomaBone marrowDNASomatic cellCell-free fetal DNADNA sequencingMedicineCirculating tumor DNACancer researchComputational biologyBiologyImmunologyInternal medicineCancerGeneGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Circulating tumor DNA faithfully recapitulates somatic mutations detected in bone marrow aspirates from patients with newly diagnosed or relapsed or recurrent myeloma. Extending these methods to enable detection of minimal residual disease will require increased sensitivity and breadth of genomic assays to maximize information content from small quantities of cell-free DNA; as well as definition of a clinically meaningful ctDNA concentration in comparison with conventional bone marrow cell-count thresholds. This review describes the use of cell-free DNA sequencing in myeloma to date, identifies challenges associated with pushing limit of detection of these assays into the realm of detecting minimal residual disease, and describes potential strategies to overcome these challenges.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.083
GPT teacher head0.386
Teacher spread0.303 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations38
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSeminars in HematologySame topicMultiple Myeloma Research and TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207