Synthesis and characterization of lignin–poly(acrylamide)–poly(2‐methacryloyloxyethyl) trimethyl ammonium chloride copolymer
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
ABSTRACT In this work, two monomers, acrylamide (AM) and [2‐(methacryloyloxy)ethyl]trimethylammonium chloride (DMC) were copolymerized from kraft lignin (KL) in an aqueous suspension initiated by free radical copolymerization in the presence of potassium persulfate. The impact of copolymerization conditions on the charge density and molecular weight of the copolymers was investigated. The molecular weight and mass balance analyses confirmed that the homopolymer [polyDMC (PDMC) and polyAM (PAM)] and undesired copolymer (AM–DMC) productions dominated as time, initiator, and DMC dosage increased more than the optimum values. The activation energy of the polymerization of KL and AM (43.02 kJ mol −1 ), KL and DMC (21.99 kJ mol −1 ), AM (14.54 kJ mol −1 ), DMC (10.34 kJ mol −1 ), and AM and DMC (18.13 kJ mol −1 ) was determined. Proton nuclear magnetic resonance, Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy, thermogravimetric analysis, and elemental analysis confirmed the production of KL–AM–DMC copolymer. © 2018 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2018 , 135 , 46338.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it