L’évolution de la médiation en entreprise : une comparaison France-Québec. Des facteurs qui peuvent influencer la présence de la médiation et leurs importances relatives
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We question ourselves in this study on the variables that can enable the presence of the mediation in the organization. These variables are represented by global institutional factors of the society that were used to compare France and the United States. ln order to realise our study, we take these the same variables like evaluation's tools and try to apply them to the Québec society and then comparing them with France. The reference model used is based on the variables identified in the study realised by Arnaud Stimec, he identified the following variables: history of the mediation in the collective relations, individual litigation at work, incentive to negotiate and mediation in labour relation, role of the governments through the laws, the role of the trade union and the right to strike being constitutional. We take those descriptions made for France and try to reproduce for each of them the portrait of Quebec. The objective aims at knowing the current situation as well as the events that led to this situation for then submitting the results obtained · to the syllogism of the author. He provides an explanatory model which supposes that there is not one characteristic development dominating making it possible to explain the evolution of the mediation in a society. Thus, the mediation can be present in places without those experiencing the same development. ln conclusion , we evaluate the impact among them in order to lead to mediation and we will look at the future in order to see what we could be expected for the mediation as resolution conflict mode in the organization.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.006 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.010 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".