Turbulence Characteristics of Classical Hydraulic Jump Using DES
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper performs a three-dimensional, unsteady, detached-eddy simulation (DES) of a classical hydraulic jump with an inlet Froude number of 8.5. The volume of fluid (VOF) method with a high-resolution interface capturing (HRIC) scheme is used for free-surface tracking. The computational results are validated using available experimental results and by ensuring that details of the flow physics based on existing knowledge are properly captured. The three-dimensional nature of the flow in the developed zone of the hydraulic jump is well demonstrated, and a better understanding of the interaction between the wall-jet flow and the roller region above it is revealed. The paper also resolves the internal turbulent structure of the classical hydraulic jump, which is not completely realized in the experimental results. Quadrant decomposition of the Reynolds shear stresses reveals that inward and outward interactions dominate the flow field. This is further ascertained by the analysis of the third-order moments of the velocity field. It is also revealed that the expanding shear layer interacts with the free surface resulting in intense undulations and breaking up of the free surface.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".