MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2790741395 · doi:10.22323/1.223.0006

New ways to search for right-handed current in $B\rightarrow \rho \ell \bar \nu$ decay

2015· article· en· W2790741395 on OpenAlexaff
Sascha Turczyk, F. U. Bernlochner, Zoltan Ligeti

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicParticle physics theoretical and experimental studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Victoria
FundersHigh Energy PhysicsOffice of ScienceU.S. Department of Energy
KeywordsPhysicsBar (unit)Sensitivity (control systems)Particle physicsStandard Model (mathematical formulation)Current (fluid)Differential (mechanical device)Physics beyond the Standard ModelElectronic engineeringEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

An interesting possibility to ease the tension between various determinations of |V ub | allows a small right-handed contribution to the Standard Model weak current.The current bounds on such a contribution are fairly weak.We propose new ways to search for such a beyond Standard Model contribution in the semileptonic B → ρℓ νℓ decay.We suggest to use generalized asymmetries in one, two, or three angular variables as discriminators, which do not require measuring the fully differential distribution, and discuss its theoretical uncertainties.We discuss how binned measurements can access all the angular information, which may be more important for B → ρℓ νℓ than it is for B → K * ℓ + ℓ -.We explore the achievable sensitivity both from the available BaBar and Belle data sets, as well as from the anticipated 50ab -1 Belle II data.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.053
GPT teacher head0.330
Teacher spread0.277 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicParticle physics theoretical and experimental studies→French-language works237,207→