MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Abstract OT1-05-03: TRIO030: A presurgical tissue-acquisition study to evaluate molecular alterations in human breast cancer tissue following short-term exposure to the androgen receptor antagonist darolutamide

2018· article· en· W2790762419 on OpenAlexaff
JR Mackey, W. Eiermann, Rodrigo Fresco, Hoki Fung, S. Carrez, C. Balcazar Lopez, DJ Slamon

Bibliographic record

VenueCancer Research · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicProstate Cancer Treatment and Research
Canadian institutionsTranslational Research in OncologyUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineBreast cancerAndrogen receptorTriple-negative breast cancerProstate cancerCancerInternal medicineEstrogen receptorOncologyAndrogenHormone

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background: Endocrine treatment remains a mainstay in the treatment of patients with estrogen-receptor (ER) positive breast cancer (BC). Although ER and progesterone receptor (PgR) are well established targets with predictive and prognostic value, the clinical significance and role of the androgen receptor (AR) is poorly understood. Darolutamide is a new AR antagonist developed for the treatment of castration-resistant prostate cancer. Darolutamide potently inhibits testosterone binding to AR and retains antagonistic properties in cells expressing increased AR levels. Understanding the biological impact of AR-blockade when darolutamide targets the AR in BC should provide foundational rationale for its development in BC. Trial Design: TRIO030 is a multi-center, open-label, tissue-acquisition study involving 60 women with early-stage invasive BC. To be able to assess the molecular alterations after darolutamide exposure in different BC subtypes, BC patients with triple-negative, or ER+/HER2 negative, or HER2 positive disease will be enrolled in the study, with 20 subjects in each group. Each participant will receive darolutamide at a dose of 600 mg b.i.d. (daily dose of 1200 mg) for a minimum duration of 14 days until the day prior to BC surgery (recommended duration of 21 days, maximum 35 days). Tumor tissue collection will include 3 pre-treatment cores (2 snap-frozen and 1 paraffin embedded) and 2 cores at surgery (1 snap-frozen and 1 paraffin embedded). Key Eligibility Criteria: Eligible female subjects will have 1) histologically proven invasive breast carcinoma for which surgery is indicated as the primary treatment modality, 2) known ER, PgR and HER2 statuses, 3) tumor confined to either the breast or to the breast and ipsilateral axilla with T1 ≥1.5cm, T2 or T3 and either clinically positive (N1 only) or clinically negative axillary nodes (N0), and 4) no prior systemic nor local treatment for BC. Study Objectives: The primary objective of this study is to identify the molecular changes that occur in BC tissue following short-term exposure to darolutamide in women with early BC. Secondary objectives include the safety and tolerability of short-term darolutamide in women with early BC. Statistical Methods: Evaluability of subjects will require minimum duration of 10 consecutive days of treatment with darolutamide, tumor tissue collection at screening and at surgery and adequacy of tumor tissue samples for molecular assessment as determined by the central laboratory. Molecular analyses will be conducted on the evaluable population. Descriptive statistics will be used to compare pre and post treatment molecular findings. Correlations will be sought among molecular alterations from tumor samples collected at baseline, following administration of darolutamide, and clinicopathologic variables. Accrual: The study will be activated in June 2017. Up to 60 evaluable subjects will be enrolled within 12 months (NCT03004534). Citation Format: Mackey JR, Eiermann W, Fresco R, Fung H, Carrez S, Lopez C, Slamon DJ. TRIO030: A presurgical tissue-acquisition study to evaluate molecular alterations in human breast cancer tissue following short-term exposure to the androgen receptor antagonist darolutamide [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2017 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2017 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2018;78(4 Suppl):Abstract nr OT1-05-03.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.014

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.071
GPT teacher head0.462
Teacher spread0.391 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCancer Research→Same topicProstate Cancer Treatment and Research→French-language works237,207→