MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2790763154 · doi:10.1080/14780887.2018.1442668

To build a home

2018· article· en· W2790763154 on OpenAlexaff
Candice Deo, Peter Gouzouasis

Bibliographic record

VenueQualitative Research in Psychology · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicDiversity and Impact of Dance
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsReading aloudPianoPerformative utteranceAutoethnographyRead aloudParagraphVisual artsChord (peer-to-peer)ArtReading (process)CommunicationPsychologyLinguisticsAestheticsComputer scienceSociologyArt historyWorld Wide WebPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This story, a performative autoethnography, is to be read aloud with a recording of “To Build A Home” by Cinematic Orchestra (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oUFJJNQGwhk). Please start the recording and begin reading the story aloud at sound of the first piano chord. Read the prose, expressively, at a moderate tempo with slight pauses at the end of each paragraph while the music plays as an accompaniment.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.047
Threshold uncertainty score0.157

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0110.005
Scholarly communication0.0040.006
Open science0.0010.009
Research integrity0.0020.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0470.014

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.436
GPT teacher head0.664
Teacher spread0.229 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueQualitative Research in PsychologySame topicDiversity and Impact of DanceFrench-language works237,207