Asymptomatic Coronary Artery Calcifications in Men with Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To determine whether the prevalence and extent of asymptomatic coronary artery atherosclerosis are increased in men with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) compared with age- and sex-matched controls, and to define the associated risk factors. METHODS: Ninety-five patients with SLE (mean ± SD age, 34.7 ± 10.1 yrs) and 100 control subjects (age 34.8 ± 9.7 yrs) with no history of coronary artery disease were screened for coronary artery calcification using multidetector computed tomography. The extent of calcification was measured using the Agatston score. The frequency of risk factors for calcification was compared between patients and controls, and the relationship between clinical and immunological characteristics and the presence of coronary artery calcification was investigated. RESULTS: Coronary artery calcification was more frequent in patients than controls [18% vs 7%, respectively (OR 2.89, 95% CI 1.07-8.65)]. These factors were independently associated with the presence of calcifications: age (OR 1.12, 95% CI 1.04-1.20), SLE diagnosis (OR 3.38, 95% CI 1.07-10.64), diabetes mellitus (OR 6.88, 95% CI 1.50-31.62), Framingham risk score (OR 1.12, 95% CI 1.00-1.23), and glomerular filtration rate (OR 0.98, 95% CI 0.96-1.00). Among patients with SLE, coronary artery calcifications were observed starting at age 32 years, within 2.3 years of diagnosis. Increasing age (OR 1.18, 95% CI 1.06-1.31), Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinics score (OR 2.85, 95% CI 1.21-6.73), and cumulative dose of prednisone (OR 1.04, 95% CI 1.01-1.08) were independent risk factors. CONCLUSION: Men with SLE are at an increased risk of coronary artery calcifications than age- and sex-matched controls. Among patients with SLE, the increased risk is associated to older age, increasing chronic damage, and cumulative dose of corticosteroids.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".