MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2790946346 · doi:10.1093/jcag/gwy008.284

A283 THE IMPACT INFLAMMATORY BOWEL DISEASE HAS ON BREASTFEEDING PATTERNS

2018· article· en· W2790946346 on OpenAlexafffundabout
S R Andrishak, Vivian Huang, Karen I. Kroeker, Levinus A. Dieleman, Brendan P. Halloran, Richard N. Fedorak, Anjali Manocha

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPregnancy and Medication Impact
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersUniversity of Alberta
KeywordsBreastfeedingMedicineInflammatory bowel diseaseDiseaseUlcerative colitisPregnancyBreast feedingMicrobiomeAnusObstetricsPediatricsInternal medicineSurgeryBioinformatics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IBD) is a group of diseases characterized by inflammation of the digestive tract.Crohn’s disease(CD) can affect any part from the esophagus to the anus, whiled ulcerative colitis (UC) only affects the large intestine. Factors that can contribute to the development of IBD include genetics, environment and microbiome. Breastmilk influences development of the neonatal microbiome and immune system. It is recommended that infants breastfeed until 12 months,to ensure nutritional and immunological development. Women with IBD have been reported to breastfeed less than healthy women. To investigate the impact IBD has on breastfeeding patterns Adult women with IBD attending the Pregnancy in IBD clinic were invited to fill out questionnaires regarding breastfeeding 2 or 3, 6, 9 and 12 months post partum (PP). They were asked if they were breastfeeding or not, and why not at each time points. They were also asked about their clinical disease activity using Harvey Bradshaw Index (HBI) for CD and Partial Mayo (pMayo) for UC. For subjects who are still in follow up (within the 12 months), we included any of their completed surveys up until July 2016. Incomplete or missing surveys were excluded from the analyses. SPSS 23.0 was used to analyze the data. Fifty women completed surveys; 46% of patients had stopped breastfeeding by 12 months, while 36% of the patients (who completed all time points) breastfed through to 12 months. There was no significant pattern when breastfeeding stopped. The top three reasons reported for cessation of breastfeeding were insufficient milk, medications and sickness. Cessation of breastfeeding was not correlated to disease activity. Almost half of patients with IBD stopped breastfeeding by 12 months postpartum. Having IBD itself was not found to be associated with cessation of breastfeeding. Insufficient milk, medications, and fatigue were the top 3 reported reasons for cessation of breastfeeding. Additional studies are being conducted to investigate if IBD affects milk production, and to address patient concerns about medications in breastfeeding. University of Alberta

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.028

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.260
Teacher spread0.248 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the Canadian Association of GastroenterologySame topicPregnancy and Medication ImpactFrench-language works237,207