MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2790954113 · doi:10.1353/gsr.2018.0017

The Necessity of Music: Variations on a German Theme by Celia Applegate

2018· article· en· W2790954113 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueGerman Studies Review · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicHistorical Influence and Diplomacy
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGermanTheme (computing)NationalismHistoryMusicalPsychoanalysisPsychologySociologyLiteratureArtPolitical scienceLaw

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Reviewed by: The Necessity of Music: Variations on a German Theme by Celia Applegate Jonathan Gentry The Necessity of Music: Variations on a German Theme. By Celia Applegate. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 2017. Pp. xii + 402. Paper $39.95. ISBN 978-1487520489. For over twenty years, Celia Applegate has maintained that historians need to study music. Her latest book, The Necessity of Music, contains fourteen previously published essays that collectively demonstrate why. These newly edited essays offer nuanced historical explorations of the relationship between music and German nationalism, a topic that has garnered increasing attention. Applegate leads a cross-disciplinary band of scholars who have convincingly argued that, despite seemingly paradoxical claims of universality and apolitical cultivation, the German music world has been routinely inflected by waves of nationalism, even during the foundational years of the early nineteenth century. Thanks to the combined influences of new historicism, the cultural turn, and nation theorization, it is now quite common to speak of Beethoven, Schumann, and other German staples of the classical music repertoire in the context of nation building. Applegate distinguishes herself from this crowd through a historian’s eye for detail, empathetic attention to the lived experience of her subjects, and by challenging stereotypes about German exclusivity. She champions, rather, the prominence and persistence of liberal nationalism in Germany’s institutions of music making. As a result, these essays can be read as fourteen measures to defend the German musical tradition from less favorable and less astute interpretations that it was inherently racist, classist, sexist, xenophobic, imperialist, state patriotic, or complicit in propelling Germany down a Sonderweg. Perhaps the most explicit link between these essays is the intersection of “high” and “popular” music worlds, such that their very bifurcation is problematic. This theme surfaces in Applegate’s repeated focus on choral groups, house music, military bands, film music, touring musicians, festivals, and fairs, all of which performed the high art canon and laid some claim to its capacity for Humboldtian Bildung. Indeed, the experience of the classics in everyday settings by such a wide demographic further underscores the argument that music served as a broad tool of nation building, reaching far beyond the elite sphere of philharmonic membership. Wagner’s music [End Page 172] comes across as especially protean, being performed by small town operas, rowdy brass bands, and families around the piano. Applegate’s demonstrations that highbrow and lowbrow overlapped counter arguments that the very genres of German art music were classist, especially as articulated by David Gramit in Cultivating Music: The Aspirations, Interests and Limits of German Musical Culture (2002). Despite a stated division into three sections (Places, People, and Public and Private), the essays of The Necessity of Music really divide in half, eight dealing with the era before unification and six that mostly focus on what came after. The first half is more comprehensive, integrating nearly all the era’s major figures and locating them within broader social and institutional contexts. In addition to whole essays on Mendelssohn, Schumann, Brahms, and A.B. Marx, there are sections on Bach, Wagner, and Carl Friedrich Zelter. By contrast, the second half is highly episodic and relatively detached from the kind of canonic persons and events analyzed in the first half. As the collection makes no claim to evenness or coverage, the contrast between halves would hardly be an issue, except that one of the book’s more provocative arguments is precisely for musical continuity across the 1871 threshold. For the period of the Kaiserreich and beyond, Applegate argues for the sustained vibrancy of musical life, including its capacity for Bildung and nation formation, but she focuses almost exclusively on the realms of the private, the amateurish, and the lesser known. Consequently, her analyses of the complexities of nationalism and of the famous figures of German culture, so masterful for the period before 1871, dissipates as she addresses the eras when nationalism was more radical and problematic. This unevenness begs questions about the extent of such continuity and about the public role that music played in helping Germans negotiate a less liberal nationhood in the twentieth century. Undoubtedly, Applegate’s forthcoming and highly anticipated monograph, Music and the...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.403
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.076
GPT teacher head0.434
Teacher spread0.358 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it