MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2790954113 · doi:10.1353/gsr.2018.0017

The Necessity of Music: Variations on a German Theme by Celia Applegate

2018· article· en· W2790954113 sur OpenAlex
Jonathan Gentry

Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base

Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.

aboutLe titre ou le résumé porte un signal canadien du lexique géographique.
no affAucune affiliation canadienne : ce travail est invisible pour une base fondée sur la seule affiliation.
Aucune affiliation canadienne. Une base fondée sur la seule affiliation (le devis habituel) n'aurait jamais vu ce travail. C'est l'un des travaux qui justifient l'inversion de la base.

Notice bibliographique

RevueGerman Studies Review · 2018
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineSocial Sciences
ThématiqueHistorical Influence and Diplomacy
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésGermanTheme (computing)NationalismHistoryMusicalPsychoanalysisPsychologySociologyLiteratureArtPolitical scienceLaw

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Reviewed by: The Necessity of Music: Variations on a German Theme by Celia Applegate Jonathan Gentry The Necessity of Music: Variations on a German Theme. By Celia Applegate. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 2017. Pp. xii + 402. Paper $39.95. ISBN 978-1487520489. For over twenty years, Celia Applegate has maintained that historians need to study music. Her latest book, The Necessity of Music, contains fourteen previously published essays that collectively demonstrate why. These newly edited essays offer nuanced historical explorations of the relationship between music and German nationalism, a topic that has garnered increasing attention. Applegate leads a cross-disciplinary band of scholars who have convincingly argued that, despite seemingly paradoxical claims of universality and apolitical cultivation, the German music world has been routinely inflected by waves of nationalism, even during the foundational years of the early nineteenth century. Thanks to the combined influences of new historicism, the cultural turn, and nation theorization, it is now quite common to speak of Beethoven, Schumann, and other German staples of the classical music repertoire in the context of nation building. Applegate distinguishes herself from this crowd through a historian’s eye for detail, empathetic attention to the lived experience of her subjects, and by challenging stereotypes about German exclusivity. She champions, rather, the prominence and persistence of liberal nationalism in Germany’s institutions of music making. As a result, these essays can be read as fourteen measures to defend the German musical tradition from less favorable and less astute interpretations that it was inherently racist, classist, sexist, xenophobic, imperialist, state patriotic, or complicit in propelling Germany down a Sonderweg. Perhaps the most explicit link between these essays is the intersection of “high” and “popular” music worlds, such that their very bifurcation is problematic. This theme surfaces in Applegate’s repeated focus on choral groups, house music, military bands, film music, touring musicians, festivals, and fairs, all of which performed the high art canon and laid some claim to its capacity for Humboldtian Bildung. Indeed, the experience of the classics in everyday settings by such a wide demographic further underscores the argument that music served as a broad tool of nation building, reaching far beyond the elite sphere of philharmonic membership. Wagner’s music [End Page 172] comes across as especially protean, being performed by small town operas, rowdy brass bands, and families around the piano. Applegate’s demonstrations that highbrow and lowbrow overlapped counter arguments that the very genres of German art music were classist, especially as articulated by David Gramit in Cultivating Music: The Aspirations, Interests and Limits of German Musical Culture (2002). Despite a stated division into three sections (Places, People, and Public and Private), the essays of The Necessity of Music really divide in half, eight dealing with the era before unification and six that mostly focus on what came after. The first half is more comprehensive, integrating nearly all the era’s major figures and locating them within broader social and institutional contexts. In addition to whole essays on Mendelssohn, Schumann, Brahms, and A.B. Marx, there are sections on Bach, Wagner, and Carl Friedrich Zelter. By contrast, the second half is highly episodic and relatively detached from the kind of canonic persons and events analyzed in the first half. As the collection makes no claim to evenness or coverage, the contrast between halves would hardly be an issue, except that one of the book’s more provocative arguments is precisely for musical continuity across the 1871 threshold. For the period of the Kaiserreich and beyond, Applegate argues for the sustained vibrancy of musical life, including its capacity for Bildung and nation formation, but she focuses almost exclusively on the realms of the private, the amateurish, and the lesser known. Consequently, her analyses of the complexities of nationalism and of the famous figures of German culture, so masterful for the period before 1871, dissipates as she addresses the eras when nationalism was more radical and problematic. This unevenness begs questions about the extent of such continuity and about the public role that music played in helping Germans negotiate a less liberal nationhood in the twentieth century. Undoubtedly, Applegate’s forthcoming and highly anticipated monograph, Music and the...

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesÉtudes des sciences et des technologies
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Synthèse · Signal consensuel: Synthèse
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,403
Score d'incertitude au seuil1,000

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0020,001
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,076
Tête enseignante GPT0,434
Écart entre enseignants0,358 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle