Laparoscopic Treatment of Tubal Torsion in Pregnancy
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background: Isolated tubal torsion in pregnant women is a rare diagnosis often treated with laparotomy. Case: A 37-year-old woman at 25 weeks of gestation presented with severe lower abdominal pain and vomiting. Ultrasound revealed a 6-cm ovarian cyst. She was taken to the operating room for a diagnostic laparoscopy. Results: She was found to have an isolated tubal torsion. The tube was detorted and treated with a salpingectomy. Her postoperative course, the remainder of her pregnancy, and her delivery were uncomplicated. No adverse pregnancy outcomes were associated with the laparoscopic management of her isolated tubal torsion in pregnancy. Conclusions: Laparoscopic management of adnexal pathology in pregnancy should be considered in view of the benefits of laparoscopy, including decreased postoperative pain, shorter hospital stay, quicker recovery, and improved cosmesis. (J GYNECOL SURG 34:174)
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".