Joint Optimization of Channel Selection and Frame Scheduling for Coexistence of LTE and WLAN
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Recently, the interest in operating long term evolution (LTE) in unlicensed bands (i.e., LTE-U) has increased. However, since LTE does not sense for channel vacancy prior to transmissions, whereas a wireless local area network (WLAN) is based on carrier sensing multiple access, LTE interference severely degrades the performance of WLAN. To maximize the LTE throughput while maintaining fairness between LTE and WLAN, we formulate a joint optimization problem of channel selection and frame scheduling in LTE. As a practical solution of this problem, we propose a low-complexity heuristic algorithm called the sequential operation algorithm (SOA). Evaluation results demonstrate that SOA can achieve an LTE throughput comparable to that of the optimal solution, while maintaining fairness between LTE and WLAN by selecting appropriate channels and conducting effective frame scheduling.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it