Seismic site classification and site period mapping in the Ottawa area using geophysical methods
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The 2005 National Building Code of Canada (2005NBCC) recommended new guidelines for construction in earthquake hazard areas. Estimated horizontal shearing forces at ground surface, resulting from a 1:2475 year return period earthquake, are in part based on the geotechnical/geophysical properties of the near surface at a particular building site. This project has demonstrated the use of geophysical techniques to map the variation of nearsurface geotechnical properties required to establish the seismic shaking properties within the City of Ottawa. Ottawa was chosen for this demonstration since: 1) it is an area of higher seismic hazard under the influence of the West Quebec and Ottawa Valley seismic zones, 2) a wide variation in soil and rock properties exist within the city limits, 3) similar site conditions occur throughout much of the Ottawa-St Lawrence Valley area, and, 4) GSC and university specialists were available locally, thus reducing field costs. Current 2005NBCC guidelines suggest estimates of average shear wave velocity to a depth of 30 m (Vs30) as a primary parameter required to estimate seismic shaking levels. Shear wave velocity measurement techniques were tested and modified for soil and rock conditions within the project area. These included: seismic refraction and reflection site evaluation (685 sites), multichannel analyses of surface waves (MASW-33 sites), downhole seismic measurements (16 boreholes), and multichannel towed seismic reflection profiling techniques (Landstreamer ~25 line-km). Shear wave velocities were measured throughout the soil column (to depths of 100+ m); in addition, shear wave velocities were measured for the differing rock types within the city. Within the survey area, a borehole geology data bank consisting of approximately 21900 entries was re-analysed in terms of shear wave velocity-depth structure based on the field shear wave velocity measurements. A map of the variation of Vs30 was developed from the integration of all borehole and shear wave velocity data. The map shows that low Vs30 values (associated with higher shaking levels) occur in areas where thick soft soils occur. A second map of fundamental site periods was developed from the measurement of both soil seismic properties and depth to bedrock. Estimates of such natural resonant periods of the ground are also required as an aid in estimating the response of structures to seismic shaking. The fundamental site period map indicates that significant long period resonance is associated with areas where thick soft soils occur. Comparison of this map with approximately 200 passive seismic noise measurements (horizontal to vertical spectral ratios HVSR) indicated a well-documented systematic variance. An empirical relationship between the two measurement techniques has been developed. The main products of this research are: 1) A map of Vs30 , following the guidelines of the current 2005NBCC, 2) A map of fundamental resonance period of the soil based on measured shear wave velocities and depths to resonant impedance boundaries, and 3) A data bank (approximately 22000 points) of average shear wave velocity-depth functions including depth to bedrock, bedrock shear wave velocities and fundamental site periods. It is hoped that this information will be a useful guide for city planners, geotechnical engineers, as well as emergency planning organizations. Similar geophysical applications are possible in other areas of the Ottawa- St. Lawrence valleys in the future.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".