Resolution of Some Burn Complications by Homeopathic Medicines
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Burn injuries often lead to contracture, hypertrophic changes and hypopigmentation, which not only cause serious disfigurement and functional impairment but are also associated with social isolation, psychosis and depression. This is largely because most of the patients particularly of developing countries could not afford the cost of the conventional sophisticated treatment schedule. Thus in this study I opted to test the efficacy of one homeopathic medicine, which is of extremely low cost, so that general population may follow this new treatment if found effective. The medicine Graphites was selected by me based on my previous experience on treatment of burn cases. This single medicine was used to treat 100 post-burn scar cases with proper case taking, consent and the Vancouver Scar Scale (VSS) scoring, During follow up of the patients, 84 patients showed significant improvement of VSS scoring followed by cure of most of the cases, while only 16 cases did not show any significant change after treatment. Thus my appeal to those patients who remain untreated due to want of money, should follow this simple treatment protocol, and I also assure them that this medicine has got no side effect.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".