MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2791075670 · doi:10.1177/0014585818757202

Sangue e miti della Bella Società Riformata, la Camorra di primo Ottocento

2018· article· it· W2791075670 on OpenAlexaff
Antonio Nicaso

Bibliographic record

VenueForum Italicum A Journal of Italian Studies · 2018
Typearticle
Languageit
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicItalian Fascism and Post-war Society
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesArtPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Il sangue di Napoli, inteso come fattore identitario di legame, assume una valenza specifica nell’ambito dell’organizzazione criminale che va dunque analizzata sotto il profilo antropologico-culturale. Il tema “ghenos” che dal mito e dal sacro si profanizza in un contesto di malavita e funge da sovrastruttura ideologica e simbolica alla criminalità organizzata, viene trattata da una letteratura storica peraltro non vastissima sull’argomento che deve essere riconsiderata anche alla luce della narrativa e delle fiction napoletane di successo dei nostri giorni.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesScience and technology studies
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.373
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.002
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0030.005
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.314
Teacher spread0.290 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueForum Italicum A Journal of Italian StudiesSame topicItalian Fascism and Post-war SocietyFrench-language works237,207