MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2791116020 · doi:10.1109/led.2018.2799973

Regular and Inverted Operating Regimes in TiN/a-Si/TiOx/TiN RRAM Devices

2018· article· en· W2791116020 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Electron Device Letters · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Memory and Neural Computing
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersInstitute of Population and Public Health
KeywordsTinMaterials scienceResistive random-access memoryReliability (semiconductor)OptoelectronicsSiliconElectrical conductorCondensed matter physicsVoltageElectrical engineeringPower (physics)ThermodynamicsPhysicsComposite materialEngineeringMetallurgy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Non-localized and bipolar switching in vacancy modulated conductive oxide resistive switching devices (TiN/a-Si/TiOx/TiN) is attributed to defect profile modulation in the TiOx switching layer. We observe two modes of operation-stable regular and unstable inverted, corresponding to two sets of opposite switching polarities. This is explained using a kinetic defect distribution model. The position of the defect centroid and the distribution spread determine the switching regime. The unstable inverted regime exposes the reliability concern of erroneous programming which can be avoided by operating in the regular regime with reasonable programming margin.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.036
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.235
Teacher spread0.224 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it