MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2791148539 · doi:10.1109/tia.2018.2801258

Testing the Performance of the Wavelet Modulation Technique for <inline-formula> <tex-math notation="LaTeX">$1\phi$</tex-math> </inline-formula> CHB Multilevel DC–AC Power Electronic Converters

2018· article· en· W2791148539 on OpenAlexaff
S. A. Saleh

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Industry Applications · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMultilevel Inverters and Converters
Canadian institutionsUniversity of New Brunswick
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWaveletPulse-width modulationModulation (music)H bridgeMathematicsConvertersHarmonicsBasis (linear algebra)Wavelet transformElectronic engineeringVoltageControl theory (sociology)AlgorithmEngineeringComputer scienceElectrical engineeringPhysicsAcoustics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper presents the development and performance evaluation of the wavelet modulation technique for single-phase (1φ) cascaded H-bridge (CHB) multilevel dc-ac power electronic converters (PECs). The developed technique is based on employing sets of resolution-segmented wavelet basis functions as switching signals, where each set operates one H-bridge. The number of sets of wavelet basis functions is selected to match the number of levels in the output voltage of the 1φ CHB dc-ac PEC. The wavelet modulation for 1φ CHB multilevel dc-ac PECs is implemented for performance evaluation both in simulation and experimentation. The performance of the developed technique is evaluated for linear, nonlinear, and dynamic loads. Simulation and experimental results show significant reduction of output harmonics, along with high magnitude of the fundamental component in the output voltage. The improvements offered by the wavelet modulation technique are further demonstrated through comparisons with the level-shifted and phase-shifted pulse-width modulation techniques under similar loading conditions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.238
Teacher spread0.219 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations15
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Industry ApplicationsSame topicMultilevel Inverters and ConvertersFrench-language works237,207