MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2791183077 · doi:10.1109/access.2018.2815082

Low-Profile Low-Cost High Gain 60 GHz Antenna

2018· article· en· W2791183077 on OpenAlexaff
Yazan Al-Alem, Ahmed A. Kishk

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Access · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAntenna Design and Analysis
Canadian institutionsConcordia University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAntenna measurementAntenna (radio)Antenna gainDipole antennaAntenna factorComputer scienceCoaxial antennaAntenna efficiencyAntenna rotatorMicrostrip antennaAntenna apertureAntenna arrayRadiation patternOpticsTelecommunicationsPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A new design perspective that utilizes the diffracted fields from planar metallic sheets to implement high gain, low profile, and low-cost antenna at 60 GHz is presented. The proposed antenna is matched over the 60-GHz ISM band (57-64 GHz). The proposed antenna can be employed in a linear antenna array with one wavelength distance between the array elements without generating grating lobes. The proposed antenna structure is suitable for short range, low power applications. The proposed antenna is vialess planar structure. The simplicity of the structure is advantageous in relaxing the fabrication process requirements.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.783
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.259
Teacher spread0.240 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations21
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE AccessSame topicAntenna Design and AnalysisFrench-language works237,207