Sweet corn (<i>Zea mays</i>) cultivar tolerance to nicosulfuron
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Eleven sweet corn cultivars were evaluated to identify cultivar sensitivity to nicosulfuron in three field studies, conducted over a 2-yr period. Response to nicosulfuron varied, depending on cultivar and application dose. DelMonte 2038 was highly sensitive to nicosulfuron, resulting in very severe injury and in most cases the death of all plants at both locations each year. At Exeter in 1997 and 1998, injury was slight, with no yield reductions on other cultivars. At Simcoe in 1998, five cultivars showed severe visual injury, especially at 50 g ha−1 of nicosulfuron; however, this did not always result in a significant yield reduction. Cultivars with a yield reduction were Elite, GH 1703 and Calico Belle. The cultivars Bonus Bt, Reveille, Krispy-King, GSS 7831 and GH 2690 were classified as fully tolerant to field applications of nicosulfuron showing injury of 5% or less at 25 g ha−1 and with no yield reduction. Key words: Sensitivity, herbicide injury, cultivars, nicosulfuron, Zea mays
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".