Protecting Home User Devices with an SDN-Based Firewall
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Internet-connected consumer electronics marketed as smart devices (also known as Internet-of-Things devices) usually lack essential security protection mechanisms. This puts user privacy and security in great danger. One of the essential steps to compromise vulnerable devices is locating them through horizontal port scans. In this paper, we focus on the problem of detecting horizontal port scans in home networks. We propose a software-defined networking (SDN)-based firewall platform that is capable of detecting horizontal port scans. Current SDN implementations (e.g., OpenFlow) do not provide access to packet-level information, which is essential for network security applications, due to performance limitations. Our platform uses FleXight, our proposed new information channel between SDN controller and data path elements to access packet-level information. FleXight uses per-flow sampling and dynamical sampling rate adjustments to provide the necessary information to the controller while keeping the overhead very low. We evaluate our solution on a large real-world packet trace from an ISP and show that our system can identify all attackers and 99% of susceptible victims with only 0.75% network overhead. We also present a detailed usability analysis of our system.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it