La quête d’autonomie résidentielle des femmes inuites du Nunavik
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cet article explore la quête d’autonomie résidentielle des femmes inuites du Nunavik selon une perspective relationnelle. Basé sur des témoignages de femmes au sujet de la crise du logement, il montre les liens étroits entre le surpeuplement des maisons et la violence familiale et met en évidence les limites du système de logement social face aux tentatives de certaines femmes pour sortir de situations familiales difficiles. Loin de refléter un désir d’émancipation féminine et de rupture relationnelle, cette quête d’autonomie s’avère plutôt être une tentative de se procurer un environnement sécuritaire, étape devenue essentielle dans le rétablissement de saines relations sociales pour certaines femmes inuites du Nunavik. L’intérêt de développer une perspective relationnelle sur la question du logement des femmes invite à repenser de façon plus globale les politiques actuelles de logement social qui fournissent aux Inuits, selon la distinction d’Ingold, des abris (buildings) plutôt que de véritables foyers (dwellings).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.007 | 0.004 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".