MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2791287723 · doi:10.4000/communication.7464

Deborah DAVIDSON (dir.) (2017), The Tattoo Project. Commemorative Tattoos, Visual Culture, and the Digital Archive

2018· article· en· W2791287723 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Stéphane Héas

Bibliographic record

VenueCommunication · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicTattoo and Body Piercing Complications
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsArtArt historyVisual cultureVisual arts

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

L’ouvrage collectif dirigé par Deborah Davidson constitue une partie du projet concernant les tatouages commémoratifs, réalisés donc précisément en mémoire d’un être disparu. Dans le même mouvement, une archive internétique (films, photographies, textes, diaporamas, etc.) a été mise en place pour expliciter le projet à un plus grand nombre (http://thetattooproject.info). Le livre est le fruit du travail de 22 auteurs (chercheurs et chercheures en anglais, humanités, philosophie, sociologie, s...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesScience and technology studies
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.904
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0030.004
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.044
GPT teacher head0.369
Teacher spread0.324 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCommunicationSame topicTattoo and Body Piercing ComplicationsFrench-language works237,207