MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2791295045 · doi:10.4095/286334

Expedition report CCGS Hudson 2009 - 039: Bay of Fundy

2010· report· en· W2791295045 on OpenAlexaffabout
B J Todd, O Brown, Steve Fromm, S E Hayward, Kerstin Jerosch, V E Kostylev, Michael Z. Li, D Manning, P Mesling, Guy D. Middleton, E Patton, P Pledge, A Robertson, P L Spencer, G Standen

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typereport
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicMaritime and Coastal Archaeology
Canadian institutionsNatural Resources Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBayOceanographyGeographyFisheryGeologyBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The CCGS Hudson expedition 2009 - 039 to the Bay of Fundy took place from August 27th to September 7th, 2009. The primary scientific objective of this expedition was to collect geophysical, geological, and biological information in areas where multibeam sonar data had been collected by the Ocean Mapping Group of the University of New Brunswick, the Canadian Hydrographic Service, and the Geological Survey of Canada (Atlantic) from the mid-1990s to 2008 (Fig. 1). Specifically, the work supports objectives of the Offshore Renewable Energy project of the Offshore Geoscience Program. Insights gained from this expedition will contribute to our understanding of the Quaternary evolution of the Bay of Fundy and the seabed conditions that may affect the development of marine renewable energy infrastructure. The expedition was conducted with cooperation of scientific staff of the National Marine Fisheries Service of the United States and Fisheries and Oceans Canada. During the expedition, 756 kilometres of seismic profiles and sidescan sonograms were collected, 33 Campod stations were occupied (resulting in 1770 still images and 30.849 kilometres of video camera transects in 16:51:34 hours/minutes/seconds of recording time), 31 IKU samples were retrieved, 4 van Veen grabs were obtained and 3 cores taken at seismostratigraphically strategic locations. At four stations, a deep ocean camera prototype was tested. The general pattern of work on expedition Hudson 2009039 consisted of bottom sampling, sea floor video and photography by day, followed by a night watch collecting geophysical data (seismic profiling and sidescan sonar). Work during daylight took place on the foredeck and in the forward lab. Night work took place on the quarterdeck and the General Purpose lab (Fig. 2). The weather on this expedition was uniformly good and was remarked upon by crew and scientific staff. Hurricane Isobel was initially a concern, but it made landfall well south of the Gulf of Maine.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.743
Threshold uncertainty score0.512

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0240.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.048
GPT teacher head0.273
Teacher spread0.225 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2010
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicMaritime and Coastal ArchaeologyFrench-language works237,207