MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2791329966 · doi:10.6028/nist.ir.7880-26

NIST micronutrients measurement quality assurance program winter, spring, and fall 1998 comparability studies : results for round robin XLII, XLIII, and XLIV fat-soluble vitamins and carotenoids in human serum and round robin 11 ascorbic acid in human serum

2013· report· en· W2791329966 on OpenAlexaff
David L. Duewer, Sam A. Margolis, Katherine E. Sharpless, Jeanice B. Thomas, Margaret C. Kline

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typereport
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicBody Composition Measurement Techniques
Canadian institutionsDow Chemical (Canada)
FundersNational Cancer InstituteNational Institute of Standards and Technology
KeywordsNISTComparabilityRound robin testCarotenoidMicronutrientFood scienceComputer scienceMedicineBiologyMathematicsStatistics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The National Institute of Standards and Technology coordinates the Micronutrients Measurement Quality Assurance Program (MMQAP) for laboratories that measure fat-and water-soluble vitamins and carotenoids in human serum and plasma. This report describes the

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.008
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.081
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0080.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.143
GPT teacher head0.396
Teacher spread0.253 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicBody Composition Measurement TechniquesFrench-language works237,207