MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2791343578 · doi:10.1109/tia.2018.2794958

The Development and Performance Evaluation of a Frame-Angle-Based Direct Torque Controller for PMSM Drives

2018· article· en· W2791343578 on OpenAlexaff
S. A. Saleh, Ahmed Rubaai

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Industry Applications · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicSensorless Control of Electric Motors
Canadian institutionsUniversity of New Brunswick
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFrame (networking)Controller (irrigation)TorqueConvertersComputer scienceControl theory (sociology)Topology (electrical circuits)VoltageElectrical engineeringPhysicsArtificial intelligenceEngineeringControl (management)Telecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper presents the development and performance evaluation of a direct torque controller (DTC) for permanent-magnet synchronous motor (PMSM) drives fed by a 3φ 6-pulse wavelet-modulated dc-ac power electronic converters. The developed DTC is designed to adjust the d - q-axis components of stator voltages (vdand vq) of a PMSM in response to changes in the load torque or drive speed. The desired adjustments in vdand vqare achieved by changing the angle ϑ of a frame created by vdand vq. This frame is responsible for updating or changing the reference modulating signals that are required by the wavelet modulation technique to generate switching pulses. The complete PMSM drive system incorporating the developed DTC is implemented for a 10-hp PMSM drive system. The performance of the frame-angle-based DTC is investigated for different changes in the command torque and drive speed. Simulation and experimental test results demonstrate stable, fast, and accurate responses that are complimented by negligible sensitivity to variations in the system parameters.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.259
Teacher spread0.235 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations13
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Industry ApplicationsSame topicSensorless Control of Electric MotorsFrench-language works237,207