Efficient Performance-Centric Bandwidth Allocation with Fairness Tradeoff
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Fair bandwidth allocation in datacenter networks has received a substantial amount of research attention, as multiple tenants are hosted by virtual machines in a public cloud. In the context of private datacenters, link bandwidth is shared among applications running data parallel frameworks, such as MapReduce, instead. In this paper, we introduce the rigorous definition of performance-centric fairness, with the guiding principle that the performance that data parallel applications will enjoy should be proportional to their weights. We first investigate the problem of maximizing application performance while maintaining strict performance-centric fairness. We then present an inherent tradeoff between fairness and efficiency, which is interpreted from the perspectives of bandwidth utilization and social welfare, respectively. From the first perspective, we propose an algorithm to improve bandwidth utilization by introducing an extended version of fairness. From the second perspective, we formulate an optimization problem of bandwidth allocation that maximizes the social welfare across all the applications, allowing a tunable degree of relaxation on performance-centric fairness. A distributed algorithm is then presented to solve the problem, based on dual based decomposition. With extensive simulations, we demonstrate the effectiveness of our algorithms in improving efficiency and application performance (by up to 1.4X), with flexible degree of relaxation on the performance-centric fairness.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.005 | 0.010 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".