Introduction to special section: Low-permeability resource plays of the Western Canada Sedimentary Basin — Defining the sweet spots
Bibliographic record
Abstract
PreviousNext No AccessInterpretationVolume 6, Issue 2Introduction to special section: Low-permeability resource plays of the Western Canada Sedimentary Basin — Defining the sweet spotsAuthors: Per K. PedersenDavid W. EatonPer K. PedersenUniversity of Calgary, Department of Geoscience, Calgary, Canada. E-mail: ; .Search for more papers by this authorEmail the author at [email protected]Email the author at [email protected] and David W. EatonUniversity of Calgary, Department of Geoscience, Calgary, Canada. E-mail: ; .Search for more papers by this authorEmail the author at [email protected]Email the author at [email protected]https://doi.org/10.1190/INT-2018-0315-SPSEINTRO.1 SectionsAboutFull TextPDF/ePub ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissions ShareFacebookTwitterLinked InRedditEmail "Introduction to special section: Low-permeability resource plays of the Western Canada Sedimentary Basin — Defining the sweet spots." Interpretation, 6(2), pp. SEi–SEiiReferencesClarkson, C. R., and P. K. Pedersen, 2011, Production analysis of Western Canadian unconventional light oil plays: Canadian Unconventional Resources Conference, SPE, doi: 10.2118/149005-MS.CrossrefGoogle ScholarMacKay, P., 2018, The Western Canada super basin: A confluence of science, technology, and ideas: Presented at the Global Super Basins Leadership Conference, AAPG.Google ScholarMlada, S., 2016, Canada shale: Challenges in the low commodity environment: Oil and Gas Financial Journal, http://www.ogfj.com/articles/print/volume-13/issue-4/features/canada-shale.html, accessed 14 March 2018.Google ScholarNational Energy Board (NEB), 2013, The ultimate potential for unconventional petroleum from the Montney Formation of British Columbia and Alberta — Energy briefing note, 23, https://www.neb-one.gc.ca/nrg/sttstc/ntrlgs/rprt/ltmtptntlmntnyfrmtn2013/ltmtptntlmntnyfrmtn2013-eng.html, accessed 14 March 2018.Google ScholarNRCan, 2017, British Columbia’s shale and tight resources, http://www.nrcan.gc.ca/energy/sources/shale-tight-resources/17692, accessed 14 March 2018.Google ScholarPedersen, P. K., 2016, Unconventional tight light oil play types, Western Canada Sedimentary Basin: AAPG Allan P. Bennison Distinguished Lecture Tour, Fall 2016, http://www.aapg.org/career/training/in-person/distinguished-lecturer/abstract/Articleid/32864/unconventional-tight-light-oil-play-types-western-canada-sedimentary-basin, accessed 14 March 2018.Google ScholarPreston, A., G. Garner, K. Beavis, O. Sadiq, and S. Stricker, 2016, Duvernay reserves and resources report: A comprehensive analysis of Alberta’s foremost liquids-rich shale resource, https://aer.ca/documents/reports/DuvernayReserves_2016.pdf, accessed 14 March 2018.Google ScholarFiguresReferencesRelatedDetailsCited byBasin-scale multi-decadal analysis of hydraulic fracturing and seismicity in western Canada shows non-recurrence of induced runaway fault rupture24 August 2022 | Scientific Reports, Vol. 12, No. 1The Role of Chemistry in Fracture Pattern Development and Opportunities to Advance Interpretations of Geological Materials13 September 2019 | Reviews of Geophysics, Vol. 57, No. 3Determination of stimulated reservoir volume and anisotropic permeability using analytical modelling of microseismic and hydraulic fracturing parametersJournal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering, Vol. 58 Volume 6Issue 2May 2018Pages: 1M-Y1ISSN (print):2324-8858 ISSN (online):2324-8866 publication data© 2018 Society of Exploration Geophysicists and American Association of Petroleum GeologistsPublisher:Society of Exploration GeophysicistsAmerican Association of Petroleum Geologists HistoryPublished Online: 19 Apr 2018Published in print: 01 May 2018 CITATION INFORMATION Per K. Pedersen and David W. Eaton, (2018), "Introduction to special section: Low-permeability resource plays of the Western Canada Sedimentary Basin — Defining the sweet spots," Interpretation 6: SEi-SEii. https://doi.org/10.1190/INT-2018-0315-SPSEINTRO.1 Plain-Language Summary PDF Download Metrics Loading ...
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".