MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Abstract P3-07-08: Temozolomide as a targeted therapy strategy for triple negative breast cancer

2018· article· en· W2791439302 on OpenAlexaffabout
EN Kornaga, Katherine Gratton, Qingli Shi, Andrew I. Yang, NA Nixon, Gloria Roldan Urgoiti, DG Morris

Bibliographic record

VenueCancer Research · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAdvanced Breast Cancer Therapies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of CalgaryAlberta Health Services
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTemozolomideBreast cancerTriple-negative breast cancerO-6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferaseCancer researchMethyltransferaseMedicinePopulationCancerSynthetic lethalityOncologyDNA methylationChemotherapyMethylationDNA repairInternal medicineBiologyGeneGene expressionGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract BACKGROUND: Approximately 15% of newly diagnosed breast cancers are classified as triple negative (TNBC). TNBCs are considered more aggressive and have a worse prognosis as no targeted therapies are currently available. These tumors are routinely treated with chemotherapy agents with only modest proven efficacy. Temozolomide (TMZ) is an oral chemotherapy agent commonly used for the treatment of brain tumors and melanoma. TMZ is an alkylating agent, and its therapeutic benefit depends on its ability to alkylate/methylate DNA, most commonly at the N-7 or O-6 positions of guanine residues. This process leads to DNA damage and subsequently triggers cell death. Cells that express the enzyme O6-Methylguanine-DNA Methyltransferase (MGMT) are able to repair damage caused by TMZ. Tumors that lack expression of MGMT, owing to methylation of the gene promoter, demonstrate a better response to TMZ treatment as a result of synthetic lethality. It was first reported in 2012 that TNBCs were more likely to be MGMT methylated, which was confirmed by another group that reported up to 64% of wild-type BRCA1 TNBC exhibited MGMT gene methylation. In 2013 it was found that basal-like breast cancers were more likely to be MGMT methylated and linked to larger tumor size. Together these findings suggest that a sub-population of TNBCs lack MGMT expression, due to promoter methylation. Currently, TMZ is not a treatment option for breast cancers given the modest efficacy of TMZ noted in breast cancer clinical trials; however, most of these trials have focused on using this agent to either treat or prevent brain metastases, due to TMZs ability to cross the blood-brain barrier. Importantly, none of these trials investigated MGMT expression or specifically TNBC populations. We hypothesize that TMZ may be a viable and efficacious treatment option for TNBCs that lack MGMT expression, due to promoter methylation. METHODS: We analyzed 12 archival specimens and 4 TNBC cell lines (HTB132, HTB26, HTB126 and HCC1806) for MGMT expression using a qRT-PCR clinical assay available from Calgary Laboratory Services. Additionally, we also looked at MGMT protein expression in the cell lines using Western Blot analysis to confirm the qRT-PCR results. Finally, we performed an in vitro assay with TNBC cell lines to determine cytotoxicity of TMZ. RESULTS: Analysis of the archival specimens found that 33% of samples analyzed had MGMT promoter methylation by qRT-PCR. Additionally, we found that HTB26 and HTB126 cell lines showed MGMT promoter methylation by qRT-pCR analysis. Western Blot analysis confirmed lack of MGMT expression in these two cell lines, and also identified another cell line (HCC1806) lacking MGMT protein that was classified as unmethylated by the qRT-PCR clinical assay. Moreover, our in vitro assay found that two cell lines (HTB26 and HCC1806) showed a noticeable response to treatment with TMZ. Interestingly, HTB126 did not show response to TMZ, suggesting that there may be another putative resistance pathway. CONCLUSIONS: Preliminary findings suggest that TMZ may be a viable targeted treatment option for TNBCs. Currently, we are investigating drug response using in vivo mouse models, as well as investigating synergistic combination therapy options. Citation Format: Kornaga EN, Gratton K, Shi Q, Yang A, Nixon NA, Roldan Urgoiti G, Morris DG. Temozolomide as a targeted therapy strategy for triple negative breast cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2017 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2017 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2018;78(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P3-07-08.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.594
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0120.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.117
GPT teacher head0.463
Teacher spread0.346 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCancer ResearchSame topicAdvanced Breast Cancer TherapiesFrench-language works237,207