MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2791453812 · doi:10.1093/jcag/gwy009.241

A241 MASSIVE OBSCURE GI BLEEDING FROM IDIOPATHIC JEJUNAL VARICES IDENTIFIED USING SINGLE BALLOON ENTEROSCOPY

2018· article· en· W2791453812 on OpenAlexaff
Natasha Harris, Husein Moloo, Alaa Rostom

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicGastrointestinal Bleeding Diagnosis and Treatment
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineEnteroscopyVaricesExploratory laparotomyMelenaArgon plasma coagulationDouble-balloon enteroscopyAngiodysplasiaIron-deficiency anemiaEsophageal varicesLaparotomyGastroenterologySurgeryInternal medicinePortal hypertensionAnemiaEndoscopyCirrhosis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Obscure GI bleeding from idiopathic small bowel varices is both a diagnostic and management challenge for physicians. There are very few cases reported in the literature and there is no consensus on management recommendations. To present the case of a 34-year-old male with bleeding from idiopathic jejunal varices and to review the literature. A case of idiopathic jejunal varices is reported. A literature review was conducted which identified 24 articles describing idiopathic small bowel varices. A 34-year-old male was referred for obscure GI bleeding and anemia requiring >20 pRBC transfusions over one month. The patient reported intermittent melena and anemia over the last year. He had no risk factors for portal hypertension. Upper and lower endoscopies were non-diagnostic. Anterograde single balloon enteroscopy revealed petechial like lesions that were not classic for angiodysplasia. They were treated with argon plasma coagulation and clipped. Distal to these lesions, in the mid to distal jejunum, small bowel varices were suspected but not treated pending further evaluation. No venous abnormalities were identified on CTA. The patient returned to emergency three weeks later with anemia (Hgb 69g/L). He received 2 u pRBC. The single balloon enteroscopy was repeated. There was no evidence of bleeding and the varices were tattooed (fig. 1). The patient underwent an endoscopically assisted exploratory laparoscopy that was converted to a laparotomy upon finding a grossly abnormal distal jejunum. Dilated and tortuous varicosities were identified involving approximately 150cm of small bowel. It was decided to resect the 40cm segment in which varices were visible endoscopically (fig 1). There was no evidence of thrombosis in the resected specimen. Post operatively the patient convalesced well except for a pulmonary embolism that was treated with warfarin. This event was believed to be provoked by the surgery. The patient has had no re-bleeding 12 months post-resection. Literature Review: Both familial and non-familial accounts of small bowel varices in the absence of a primary cause have been reported in the literature. When supportive therapy is insufficient, the most common treatment modality chosen is surgical resection. Select cases have also demonstrated that sclerotherapy and varix dissection can be used for to treat these lesions. Idiopathic small bowel varices pose both diagnostic and therapeutic challenges for physicians. In the literature, several treatment modalities have been shown to be successful; these include surgical resection, varix dissection and sclerotherapy. There is no consensus on the preferred treatment strategy. This report demonstrates that endoscopically assisted surgical resection is a viable management strategy for bleeding of idiopathic small bowel varices, an uncommon cause of occult GI bleeding. Fig. 1 – Top: varices viewed endoscopically. Bottom: varices visible on the exterior of the bowel wall None

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0030.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.254
Teacher spread0.233 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the Canadian Association of GastroenterologySame topicGastrointestinal Bleeding Diagnosis and TreatmentFrench-language works237,207