MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2791477137 · doi:10.1177/0021998318762295

Integration of resin flow and stress development in process modelling of composites: Part I – Isotropic formulation

2018· article· en· W2791477137 on OpenAlexafffund
S Mehdi Haghshenas, Reza Vaziri, Anoush Poursartip

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Composite Materials · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicEpoxy Resin Curing Processes
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsThermosetting polymerMaterials scienceComposite materialFinite element methodIsotropyResidual stressStress (linguistics)CompactionPlane stressStructural engineeringEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Process modelling of thermoset matrix composites is typically divided into two distinct and sequential steps: (i) flow-compaction analysis before gelation of the resin when it behaves in a fluid-like manner, and (ii) thermomechanical analysis after gelation when appreciable modulus and thereby stress development occurs. This two-part paper presents a novel approach to integrate the simulation of resin flow and stress development seamlessly during the processing of composites. Part I lays the theoretical foundation for the simpler case of isotropic materials while Part II extends the methodology to the case of transversely isotropic materials. The formulation is implemented in a 2D plane strain finite element code written in MATLAB. Relevant numerical examples are presented to demonstrate both aspects of flow-compaction and stress development throughout the curing process of thermoset matrix composite materials. The effects of resin flow on the development and the final values of residual stresses are investigated.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.252
Teacher spread0.226 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2018
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Composite MaterialsSame topicEpoxy Resin Curing ProcessesFrench-language works237,207